title：Lancia Delta Integrale vs Maturo Resto-Mod: Which Is Better?

content：The Great Delta Debate: Classic vs Resto-Mod

Imagine driving two Lancia Delta Integrales in the wettest, most miserable weather—one a beloved 1990 original, the other a £370k resto-mod by Netherlands-based Maturo. Autocar’s Deputy Road Test Editor Richard Lane, owner of the classic model, joins the test to unpack the nuances between these two icons. After analyzing their drive, we’re here to answer: Is Maturo’s “perfect road-going Delta” worth the splurge?

The Classic Integrale: Authentic Charm with Quirks

Richard’s 1990 Integrale is an 8-valve model without a catalytic converter—OEM+ with subtle upgrades like underbody bracing (for crisper turning) and a dished steering wheel (to fix Northern European driving position). It retains the era’s charm: thin pillars, compact size, and a steering feel that’s among the best assisted racks ever made.

But it has flaws. The chassis is soft (common in 30-year-old cars), and the secondary ride is harsh—hit a pothole too hard, and the radio faceplate might fly into your face. Still, it’s an artifact: a car that feels like 1988, perfect for purists who value authenticity over polish.

Maturo Resto-Mod: Precision Performance at a Price

Maturo takes a later Evo Integrale, strips it to bare metal (fixing corrosion), adds 250 welds and an integrated roll cage, and swaps in carbon fiber panels. The 2L engine gets a rebuild with forged pistons, a Garrett T3 turbo, and modern internals—this prototype makes 360hp (you can spec higher). The four-wheel-drive system is upgraded, and the chassis is stiff enough to rival modern sports cars.

Yet it’s not without trade-offs. The damping is brittle (optimized for Dutch roads, not UK’s potholes), and the £370k price tag (including the original car) is eye-watering. It feels like a GT3 version of the Delta—focused, tight, but less approachable than the classic.

Head-to-Head: Which Should You Choose?

The classic wins for authenticity: it’s a piece of history, easy to live with (if you tolerate quirks), and far cheaper. The Maturo is a technical masterpiece—stiffer, faster, and better built—but it’s a specialist car for collectors who already own a classic. Richard sums it up: he’d keep his original and buy a 911 GT3 instead of the Maturo.

content：Toolbox & Action Guide

Immediate Action Checklist

1. Test drive both: Experience the charm of the classic vs the precision of the resto-mod.
2. Prioritize your needs: Choose authenticity (classic) or performance (Maturo).
3. Budget for maintenance: Classic Integrales need regular upkeep; Maturo’s parts are bespoke.
4. Check for corrosion: Critical for any used Delta Integrale.
5. Research builders: For resto-mods, verify the builder’s reputation (like Maturo’s rally expertise).

Recommended Resources

• Autocar’s Classic Guides: Deep dives into Delta Integrale history and maintenance.
• Maturo Official Site: Details on their resto-mod process and specs.
• Lancia Owners Club: Community support for classic Delta parts and advice.

content：Final Thoughts & Engagement

The Maturo Delta is one of the finest resto-mods we’ve driven—technical, precise, and true to the Delta’s spirit. But for most purists, the classic Integrale’s charm and authenticity win out.

Which would you choose? Would you splurge on the Maturo or stick with the classic Delta Integrale? Share your thoughts in the comments below—we’d love to hear your take!