GMC Terrain vs Chevy Equinox: 2022 Comparison Review
content: The Compact SUV Dilemma
If you're comparing the 2022 GMC Terrain and Chevrolet Equinox, you've discovered they share identical engines, similar dimensions, and nearly identical price points. After analyzing this detailed comparison video, I've identified critical differences that could determine your best choice. Both SUVs start under $30,000 and offer practical space, but their approaches to design, driving experience, and value proposition vary significantly. Let's cut through the marketing to reveal which model deserves your investment.
Design and Exterior Differences
The Equinox RS trim brings unexpected style to Chevy's lineup with its blacked-out grille, 19-inch gray wheels, and distinctive cherry red tint coat. The repositioned LED running lamps (optional upgrade) and red stitching throughout the cabin create a cohesive sporty aesthetic.
Meanwhile, the Terrain AT4's "off-road" branding proves misleading. Beyond its black 17-inch wheels, knobbier tires, and front skid plate, this model lacks genuine off-road capability. The visual updates are minimal - mainly revised headlights and grille textures that fail to justify the premium price point.
Key takeaway: The Equinox RS delivers stronger visual impact for less money, while the Terrain AT4's off-road pretensions don't match reality.
Interior Quality and Practicality
Chevy Equinox RS advantages:
- Modern dashboard with vertical air vents and slim center console
- Logical gear shifter (traditional PRNDL layout)
- Consistent panel gaps and better overall fit/finish
- Red stitching and RS branding create cohesive sport theme
GMC Terrain AT4 drawbacks:
- Upright dashboard feels dated compared to Equinox
- Problematic button-style gear selector creates shifting delays
- Noticeably harder plastics on touchpoints
- Heated seat functionality missing due to chip shortage ($50 credit offered)
- Panoramic moonroof stands as the sole interior advantage
Professional assessment: At nearly $40,000, the Terrain's interior quality is unacceptable. The rough plastics and disconnected features undermine GMC's "Professional Grade" slogan. The Equinox delivers better materials and thoughtful details for approximately $3,000 less.
Performance and Driving Experience
Both SUVs use the same 1.5L turbocharged four-cylinder (170 horsepower, 203 lb-ft torque), but transmission differences create distinct driving personalities:
| Performance Aspect | Chevy Equinox | GMC Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission | 6-speed automatic | 9-speed automatic |
| Mid-range acceleration | Noticeable gaps between gears | Smoother power delivery |
| All-Wheel Drive System | Manual activation required | Manual activation required |
| Driving Modes | None (including RS trim) | None |
| Highway Fuel Economy | 30 MPG (AWD) | 28 MPG (AWD) |
Critical observations:
- The Terrain's extra gears provide marginally better responsiveness during passing maneuvers
- Both AWD systems require manual activation - a significant drawback versus competitors
- Surprisingly competent handling in both models with minimal body roll
- Brake feel outperforms expectations with firm, predictable pedal response
Missing opportunity: GM discontinued the optional 250-hp 2.0L turbo engine, leaving both models underpowered for their 3,500+ lb weight - especially noticeable when carrying passengers.
Technology and Safety Features
Shared strengths:
- Crisp 8-inch touchscreens (avoid base 7-inch units)
- Sharp 360-degree camera systems with multiple viewing angles
- Wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto compatibility
- Cloud profiles sync settings between vehicles
- Available safety alert seat (vibrating cushions instead of beeps)
Notable shortcomings:
- No standard adaptive cruise control (unlike Honda CR-V/Toyota RAV4)
- Semi-digital instrument clusters look dated
- Terrain's pop-up head-up display feels cheaply implemented
- No wireless charging in either model
- Active lane centering unavailable on both
Professional tip: The identical infotainment systems operate quickly with logical menus. Prioritize models with the enhanced safety package to compensate for the missing driver aids.
Value Verdict and Alternatives
Pricing breakdown:
- Equinox starts at $25,800 (RS trim around $37,000)
- Terrain starts at $27,900 (AT4 trim around $40,000)
After thorough analysis, I recommend the Equinox RS for most buyers. It delivers better interior quality, superior fuel economy, and more convincing styling at a lower price point. The Terrain's higher cost isn't justified by its minor transmission advantage and inferior cabin materials.
Before purchasing either, test drive these compelling alternatives:
- Honda CR-V/ Toyota RAV4: Standard advanced safety tech and available hybrids
- Mazda CX-5: Premium interior quality at similar pricing
- Hyundai Tucson/ Kia Sportage: Cutting-edge tech and longer warranties
Critical consideration: Both GM models are nearing replacement cycles. If buying now, negotiate aggressively - dealers have more flexibility on these outgoing designs.
Key Decision Factors Checklist
- Prioritize cabin quality? Choose Equinox
- Need maximum cargo flexibility? Terrain's flat-fold front seat wins
- Want best fuel efficiency? Equinox delivers 30 MPG highway
- Require smooth acceleration? Terrain's 9-speed has slight edge
- Demand advanced safety tech? Look at Honda/Toyota alternatives
Conclusion: Substance Over Badge Prestige
The 2022 Equinox proves that thoughtful design touches and value-focused pricing outweigh the Terrain's attempts at premium positioning. While both SUVs share fundamental GM architecture, the Equinox's smarter interior packaging, better fuel economy, and lower pricing make it the more rational choice. As you test drive, pay particular attention to the transmission behavior - this difference matters most in daily driving. When comparing these twins, remember: the Chevy badge delivers greater value than its GMC counterpart in this segment.