Wednesday, 11 Mar 2026

2026 Lucid Gravity Review: Performance, Flaws & Luxury Value

Lucid Gravity: The Performance SUV That Tests Luxury Expectations

Luxury EV shoppers seeking spacious three-row capability without sacrificing performance face a new contender: the 2026 Lucid Gravity. After analyzing this thorough test drive footage and combining insights from industry benchmarking, I believe this SUV delivers staggering engineering achievements alongside puzzling compromises. For those comparing premium electric SUVs like the Rivian R1S or Mercedes EQS SUV, understanding where the Gravity excels and where it frustrates is essential. Let's dissect the reality behind the specs.

Performance and Driving Dynamics: Beyond the Paper Specs

The Gravity's dual-motor Grand Touring trim generates 828 horsepower, achieving 0-60 mph in approximately 3 seconds—faster than most sports cars. What impressed me most during the driving analysis wasn't just straight-line speed, but its handling intelligence. The low-slung battery pack enables unexpectedly agile cornering for a 6,000 lb vehicle. Four-wheel steering (optional) shrinks the turning circle by 3 feet, making parking surprisingly manageable for its size.

However, the triple-chamber air suspension reveals a critical flaw. While smooth on perfect pavement, it transmits sharp, jarring impacts over bumps—a dealbreaker for luxury comfort seekers. This flaw primarily stems from the massive 21-inch wheels with ultra-low-profile tires. In practice, opting for smaller wheels with taller sidewalls would dramatically improve ride quality, yet Lucid equips its flagship trim with this uncomfortable setup.

DreamDrive Pro (hands-free driving) is marketed but not yet functional. The active lane-keeping and adaptive cruise control work well, but I caution buyers against paying for unfulfilled autonomy promises—a recurring industry issue highlighted by Tesla's history.

Interior Technology and Comfort: High-Tech with Hassles

Lucid's 34-inch curved display and floating 12.3-inch infotainment screen create a visually stunning cockpit. The instrument cluster placement deserves praise—it sits high like a HUD without steering wheel obstruction. Graphics are sharp, and responsiveness meets premium expectations.

Key frustrations emerge in daily usability:

  • Wireless charging pads require precise phone placement and often fail to connect
  • Manual seat adjustment mechanisms feel cheap and unrefined—unacceptable at this price point
  • Steering wheel buttons exhibit plasticky, wobbly tactility reminiscent of mainstream brands
  • Sunshade design is catastrophic: A flimsy mesh requires wrestling with visors and lacks coverage

Seat comfort drew mixed feedback. Lower lumbar support proved insufficient during extended drives despite adjustability. The optional massage function offers only light stimulation rather than therapeutic pressure. Where the Gravity shines is second-row space. Legroom approaches limousine levels, and optional power sunshades for rear windows (unlike the roof) work effectively.

Practicality and Cargo Flexibility: Clever but Flawed

The Gravity's minivan-inspired roofline enables best-in-class 112 cubic feet of max cargo volume. The standard power-folding second row operates smoothly with one button. The frunk (8.1 cu ft) includes a seating surface for tailgating—a thoughtful touch. Underfloor storage and well-designed cargo covers add further utility.

Third-row execution undermines these strengths:

  • Manual seat mechanisms demand excessive physical effort to raise/lower
  • Operation is noisy and unrefined during movement
  • No power assist option exists—unforgivable in a $122,000 vehicle
  • Headroom becomes tight for passengers over 5'10" due to the sloping glass roof

Pricing and Competitive Landscape

The Gravity Touring starts at $81,000 (560 hp, 337-mile range), while our loaded Grand Touring tester reached $122,000. Key rivals include:

  • Rivian R1S ($78,000+): Superior off-road capability but less refined
  • Kia EV9 ($56,000+): Value leader but slower charging and performance
  • Mercedes EQS SUV ($105,000+): Better luxury finishes but less cargo space

The critical trade-off? You sacrifice premium tactile details (buttons, materials, seat mechanisms) for segment-leading range (450 miles), hypercar acceleration, and massive cargo versatility. For shoppers prioritizing tech and space over traditional luxury touches, it's compelling. For others, the sunshade flaw alone may be disqualifying.

Final Verdict: Who Should Consider the Gravity?

Buy this SUV if you prioritize:

  1. Maximum EV range (450 miles) with ultra-fast 400 kW charging
  2. Sports-car acceleration in a family hauler
  3. Cargo volume surpassing most minivans
  4. Second-row passenger space approaching executive sedans

Look elsewhere if you expect:

  • Traditional luxury material quality and switchgear
  • Effortless operation of seats/cargo systems
  • Functional sun protection for panoramic roofs
  • Perfect ride comfort on broken pavement

Gravity Purchase Checklist

  1. Test drive specifically over rough roads to evaluate suspension harshness
  2. Physically operate the third-row seats to assess your tolerance for the mechanism
  3. Verify Apple CarPlay/Android Auto availability—still not active at review
  4. Compare real-world insurance costs—high repair complexity may increase premiums
  5. Negotiate free charging credits—Lucid often includes promotional packages

The Big Question

Would you sacrifice traditional luxury touches for class-leading range and space? Share your dealbreaker priorities in the comments below—your experience helps other shoppers navigate this evolving segment. For more data-driven EV comparisons, subscribe to our test-driven insights.