GWM Tank 300 Review: 3-Month Test Verdict on Off-Road & Family Use
content: Real-World Tank 300 Performance After Heavy Use
After subjecting the GWM Tank 300 to three months of Australian terrain—including off-roading, family trips, and commuting—we’ve uncovered critical truths about this bold 4WD contender. Testing the non-hybrid Ultra variant ($50,990), we racked thousands of kilometers to assess durability, practicality, and value. What emerged is a vehicle with surprising strengths offset by deal-breaking limitations.
Key Specifications
- Engine: 2.0L turbo petrol (162kW/380Nm)
- Transmission: 8-speed automatic with low-range transfer case
- Drivetrain: Part-time 4WD + front/rear locking differentials
- Claimed Fuel Economy: 9.5L/100km | Tested Average: 12-13L/100km (peaked at 18L/100km in heavy traffic)
- Warranty: 7-year unlimited km with 5-year roadside assist
- Servicing: $1,150 (3 years) or $2,000 (5 years) via capped pricing
Interior Comfort & Tech: Daily Driving Experience
The Tank 300’s cabin initially impresses with faux-leather heated/vented seats and Mercedes-inspired speaker grilles. After months of abuse:
- Ergonomics: Seats remained comfortable on long drives, though seat heating/cooling controls are buried in menus.
- Infotainment: The 12.3-inch system runs Apple CarPlay/Android Auto flawlessly, but core call quality is poor.
- Durability: Minimal rattles despite off-road punishment—a testament to build quality.
- Hidden Feature: A dash button activates auxiliary power under the bonnet for camping accessories.
Disappointments: Sound system quality degrades at high volumes, and cup holders are awkwardly deep.
Family & Cargo Practicality Tested
- Second Row: Accommodates three child seats comfortably. Adults enjoy ample legroom (6’ tester approved).
- Boot Space: Narrow tailgate limits access. The "camping table" hidden in the floor proved impractical.
- Payload Crisis: With a 2,155kg curb weight and 2,552kg GVM, payload is just 397kg—insufficient for families with gear.
Off-Road Capability & Longevity
Performance Highlights
- Locking Diffs: Enabled confident rock crawling and mud driving, rivaling a Land Cruiser 76 in stability.
- Suspension: Soaked up impacts without degradation after repeated hits.
- Ground Clearance: Independent front suspension bash plates showed surface rust but no structural damage.
Critical Weaknesses
- Braking Instability: Emergency stops cause rear wheels to lift due to soft front suspension—a major safety concern.
- Recovery Points: Only one front tie-down point; second requires aftermarket fabrication.
Fuel Efficiency & Driving Dynamics
- Real-World Figures: Highway driving hit 12-13L/100km; urban/off-road use spiked to 15-18L/100km.
- Driving Experience: Comfortable ride with noticeable body roll. Lane-keep assist defaults to "on" and is overly aggressive.
- Indicator Quirk: Poorly detented stalk causes accidental activation.
Tank 300 vs. Toyota Land Cruiser 76
| Aspect | Tank 300 | Land Cruiser 76 |
|---|---|---|
| Off-Road Stability | Confident with locking diffs | Similar capability |
| Payload | 397kg (Inadequate) | 1,200kg (Best-in-class) |
| Brake Towing | 3,500kg | 3,500kg |
| Price | $50,990 | $80,000+ |
Verdict: Who Should Buy It?
The Tank 300 excels as a comfortable, capable off-roader for couples or solo adventurers. Its 7-year warranty and plush interior outshine rivals like the Jeep Wrangler. However, the dangerous braking behavior and crippling payload limit make it unsuitable for families or heavy tourers.
Actionable Takeaways
- Test Braking: Simulate emergency stops during your test drive.
- Calculate Payload: Use this formula: GVM (2,552kg) – Curb Weight (2,155kg) = Your Load Limit.
- Hybrid Consideration: Evaluate the hybrid model for better fuel economy.
Final Thought: "The Tank 300 redefines value in off-road comfort but falls short as a family hauler. For $50K, it’s a compelling option—if you can live with its flaws."
"Would payload limits or braking issues deter you from buying the Tank 300? Share your deal-breakers below!"
