Lucid Gravity vs Rivian R1S: Performance Test Results Revealed
content:
If you're comparing premium electric SUVs, the Lucid Gravity and Rivian R1S represent two distinct philosophies. The Gravity prioritizes road performance and aerodynamics, while the R1S emphasizes off-road capability and adventure readiness. In Edmunds' rigorous U-Drag test—a quarter-mile drag race followed by a 180-degree turn and return sprint—the Lucid Gravity Grand Touring (828 hp) narrowly defeated the Rivian R1S Tri-Motor (850 hp) twice. This analysis breaks down why, revealing critical insights for your buying decision.
Raw Performance Metrics
Acceleration favors Rivian, but top speed cripples it. Test data shows:
| Metric | Lucid Gravity GT | Rivian R1S Tri-Motor |
|---|---|---|
| 0-60 mph | Not Shown | 3.0 seconds |
| Quarter-Mile Time | 11.3+ seconds* | 11.3 seconds |
| Quarter-Mile Speed | 121.8+ mph* | 121.8 mph |
| Top Speed (Test) | 130 mph | 112 mph (limited) |
| Max Cornering G-Force | 1.05 Gs | Lower (not specified) |
| U-Drag Win Time | 33.2 seconds | 34.5 seconds |
*Note: Gravity exceeded R1S’s trap speed but official time not shown. Edmunds confirmed R1S won quarter-mile.
Launch advantage couldn’t overcome speed deficit. The Rivian consistently launched harder thanks to its 1,103 lb-ft torque and optimized Sport Mode launch control. Test driver Jonathan Elfalan noted: "That Rivian launches like hell... getting out of the hole really good." However, its 112 mph electronic limiter proved decisive on the return sprint, where the Gravity hit 130 mph.
Handling and Dynamics Breakdown
Lucid’s chassis mastery shone during braking and cornering. Engineers recommended partial stability control for optimal performance. Testers observed:
- Gravity exhibited superior composure under heavy braking
- Tighter turn-in and apex precision
- Minimal body roll versus the Rivian’s "lazy" cornering attitude
Driver Alistair Weaver highlighted: "This [Gravity] doesn’t convince you it’s an SUV... it just does the performance thing so well."
Rivian prioritized stability over agility. Its softer suspension and higher ride height—common in off-road EVs—caused noticeable nose dive during braking and understeer during the turn. Elfalan reported: "It’s a little hard to modulate... Stop, big boy!" despite praising its surprising stopping power.
Engineering Philosophy Implications
Lucid’s focus is road performance. The Gravity shares its platform with the record-breaking Air sedan, prioritizing:
- Low center of gravity
- Aerodynamic efficiency
- Track-derived thermal management
Rivian emphasizes adventure capability. The R1S’s design prioritizes:
- Off-road suspension travel
- Water fording ability
- Gear storage solutions
This test reveals a critical trade-off: Vehicles optimized for unpaved terrain inherently sacrifice on-road dynamics due to higher weight, taller ride height, and softer damping.
Buyer’s Action Plan
- Prioritize acceleration? Choose Rivian R1S for brutal launches
- Value cornering/road trips? Lucid Gravity’s higher top speed and stability win
- Need off-road ability? Rivian’s approach angle and suspension are superior
- Haul large groups? Verify third-row space—both offer three rows
Advanced Resources:
- Edmunds U-Drags Leaderboard (Ideal for comparing real-world performance)
- SAE J2344 Standards (Explains EV durability differences)
- Charging Network Maps (Critical for long trips in either vehicle)
Conclusion: Two Philosophies, One Clear On-Road Winner
The Lucid Gravity’s integrated performance engineering delivers tangible advantages on pavement. While the Rivian R1S wins drag launches, the Gravity’s balanced braking, cornering stability, and unrestricted top speed make it faster in real-world scenarios involving turns or highway driving. As Elfalan concluded: "Take one look and know which corners better."
"When choosing between these EVs, which matters more to you: raw straight-line power or balanced handling? Share your priority below!"
